Wink Pings

When Small Models Start Disrupting Large Models: Why NVIDIA's SLM Framework Matters

NVIDIA's latest research reveals that lightweight Small Language Models (SLMs) tailored for specific tasks have surpassed Large Language Models (LLMs) in efficiency, cost, and controllability, potentially marking a turning point in AI agent architectures.

Using a 175-billion-parameter GPT-3 to handle a simple API call task is like opening a beer bottle with a nuclear warhead. NVIDIA's paper finally lays it bare: the most significant AI transformation in 2025 may come from the uprising of small models (SLMs).

![Image 1](https://wink.run/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FG0E0O5tbsAAuoDe%3Fformat%3Dpng%26name%3Dlarge)

The absurd reality of current AI agents is that no matter how simple the task, they default to calling GPT-4-level large models. Researchers crunched the numbers—70% of daily agent tasks (document summarization, data extraction, template generation) don't require LLMs' "reasoning superpowers" at all. SLMs are not only sufficient but superior.

Some counterintuitive examples:

- The 6.7B-parameter Toolformer outperforms GPT-3 in API tool calls

- The 7B-parameter DeepSeek-R1-Distill surpasses Claude 3.5 in reasoning tasks

- Models like Phi-3 have proven that parameter scale and task performance aren't positively correlated

![Image 2](https://wink.run/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FG0E0QtrboAAbi15%3Fformat%3Dpng%26name%3Dlarge)

SLMs' killer advantages:

1. 10-30x lower cost

2. 80% reduction in response latency

3. Energy consumption as low as 5% of LLMs

4. Deployable on consumer-grade hardware

5. More stable output formats (JSON/XML/code)

![Image 3](https://wink.run/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpbs.twimg.com%2Fmedia%2FG0E0RkPaQAEUDs3%3Fformat%3Dpng%26name%3Dlarge)

The industry's hesitation to shift is pragmatic:

- Sunk costs in existing LLM infrastructure

- Evaluation standards overly biased toward general capabilities

- Small models lack media visibility

But practices like MetaGPT show that 60%-70% of LLM calls can be entirely replaced by SLMs. The correct architecture for future agent systems should be: use SLMs for standardized tasks and call LLMs only when genuine creativity is needed—just as you wouldn't hire a Nobel laureate for every math problem.

Paper link: [arxiv.org/abs/2506.02153](https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02153)

发布时间: 2025-09-05 18:13