Someone used Perplexity AI to hit Google's first page in 10 hours—the process is brutally simple:

1. Use Semrush/Ahrefs to find low-competition keywords (KD<10)

2. Frame the keyword as a title in Perplexity Pro

3. Let AI generate a draft, then sprinkle in personal opinions

4. Spam promotions + submit to Google Search Console within 24 hours

This "parasite SEO" tactic works—Google's algorithm currently gives fresh content a 48-hour freshness boost. But the 53 copy-pasted "AI" replies in the comments are more ironic than the original tweet.

The only worthwhile discussion in the replies came from @Dylan de Jonge, who mentioned Claude's Artifacts can achieve similar results, and @AiXander, who pointed out this is essentially a win for On-Page SEO. Truth is, when tools become so easy "your grandma could use them" (direct quote), real competitiveness reverts to the most basic content value judgment.


The OP's "free SEO tutorial" hook is textbook: baiting with a 145,000 monthly visits case study, then funneling to $1,000/hour consulting. This marketing spiel pairs perfectly with AI quick-fix guides—both reek of "assembly-line success formulas."

The real question now: When everyone uses AI to mass-produce "low-hanging fruit" content, which will collapse first—Google's countermeasures or users' content standards?