Wink Pings

569,649 Contributions, Four People, and a Question No One Answered

Four OpenClaw developers entered the Linux Foundation Top 100 contributors list, with a combined 569,649 contributions, accounting for 13.8% of the list’s total. steipete tops the list with 421,865 contributions in one year. The first thing asked in the comments was: how many of those were submitted by agents?

OpenClaw posted a set of numbers on X: four developers entered the Linux Foundation LFX Insights Top 100 contributors, with a combined 569,649 contributions, accounting for 13.8% of the total contributions in the Top 100. The rankings are #1 @steipete, #7 @vincent_koc, #33 @obviyus, and #57 @dallinfinite.

LFX Insights is an open source project analytics platform under the Linux Foundation; the Top 100 contributors are ranked by contribution volume over the past 12 months. In the post, OpenClaw thanked the open source community and included a link to the leaderboard.

Counting four people over 365 days a year, 569,649 contributions average out to about 390 per person per day. This number first raised sleep questions. Some users asked in replies whether these people sleep at all, or just commit. Others noted that four developers accounted for 13.8% of the total contributions in the Top 100, with steipete ranked first.

Screenshot of the Linux Foundation Top 100 contributors, showing steipete’s contribution count as 421,865

In the screenshot posted by user akshit.io, steipete’s contribution count is 421,865, an increase of 421,807 over one year, with the growth rate shown as 727253.4%. The original text next to the screenshot says, “only 58 commits older than 12 months.” The sentence lacks more context, but the number itself is striking enough.

More noteworthy is the first follow-up question in the replies. Moriarty asked: “How many of those are agent commits?” In other words, how many of these commits were made by agents. OpenClaw did not answer in the post. The leaderboard counts contribution volume; it does not label whether a commit came from a human or an agent, nor does it distinguish manual changes from automated workflows.

If agents participating in commits has already become routine, the meaning of Top 100 contributors changes. It can still show that a project is active, but it is hard to equate directly with individual output. Four people contributing 569,649 times is a number worth thanking in the open source community. In the year when agents began writing code, this number gains another layer of questions that need explaining.

Original post: https://x.com/openclaw/status/2115636811594915985

Leaderboard: https://insights.linuxfoundation.org/leaderboards/contributors

发布时间: 2026-10-29 13:29